In a previous post (How Should Christians View Israel- Pt. 1), we learned that God’s dealings with Israel are based on an eternal and unconditional covenant God made with Abraham and his descendants in Genesis 12. This covenant was not dependent on the faithfulness of Abraham or his descendants but is based on the faithfulness of God in keeping His promises. Numbers 23:19a makes it clear that “God is not a man, that he should lie…”. If God makes an unconditional promise, we can be certain He will keep it.
The Bible is clear that God has not forsaken His chosen people- the Israelites. Yet, over the years, a pernicious teaching has arisen and has even crept into churches which teaches that the church has replaced or superseded Israel and that the promises God made to Israel now apply to the church. This type of teaching is called ‘Replacement Theology’ or ‘Supersessionism’ and is commonly taught in Roman Catholic, Mainline Protestant, and some Reformed churches. This teaching has historically been taught by influential theologians such as: Augustine of Hippo, Martin Luther, and John Calvin. This teaching has recently been promoted by prominent social media influencers such as: Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson. Those who hold to this teaching reject the idea that the Old Testament covenants and promises God made to Israel will be literally fulfilled to Israel- instead, God’s promises to Israel are now applied to the church. Basically, this teaching promotes the idea that God is finished with Israel (the Jewish people) and that the church has completely replaced ethnic Israel in God’s redemptive plan.
Tragically, Replacement Theology has historically been the theological basis from which many professing Christians have justified antisemitic behavior. Consider the following observation: “Replacement theology is the root of Christian antisemitism. By teaching that God has cast off Israel forever, it paves the way for centuries of persecution—from medieval pogroms to the Holocaust—because if Jews are no longer God’s people, their suffering becomes ‘proof’ of divine abandonment rather than a call to repentance and restoration.” (Dr. Renald Showers)
From a Scriptural standpoint, Replacement Theology requires ignoring or spiritualizing many straightforward passages of Scripture. Consider the following Scriptures that teach that God still has a plan for Israel that is distinct from the Church:
- We have already learned about the Abrahamic Covenant which the Bible teaches is eternal and unconditional. For example, in Genesis 17:7-8, we find that the Abrahamic Covenant is “an everlasting covenant” and that the Promised Land is an “everlasting possession”- In other words, this Covenant still stands today!
- In Romans 9, Paul spoke of his Jewish brethren as his “kinsmen according to the flesh: Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises.” (vv. 3b-4). In these verses, Paul makes it clear that the covenants and promises of God still belong to ethnic Israel.
- In Romans 11, we read that Israel (as an ethnic group) has not been cast away by God: “I say then, Hath God cast away his people [ethnic Israel]? God forbid. For I [Paul] also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew…” (v. 1-2a) God has not cast away the Israelites. God’s promises still stand. His eternal covenants are still in place. And though the Israelites have been temporarily (not permanently) set aside in spiritual blindness, God still has a future for His people- “For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. And so all Israel shall be saved…” (vv. 25-26a).

- In Scripture, Israel is symbolized as an ‘olive tree’ (Hosea 14:4-6). In Romans 11, this symbology is alluded to in describing how Gentile believers relate to Israel. Because of their rejection of Jesus as Messiah, some of the natural ‘branches’ (ethnic Jews) have been temporarily broken off from the tree (the place of blessing). One day the ‘natural branches’ will be grafted back into the olive tree (vv. 23-24). Gentile believers are described as being a ‘wild olive tree’ who are grafted into the natural olive tree. Gentile believers are grafted into the tree, yet nothing in this passage says that we replace the natural branches or that the natural branches won’t ever be grafted back into the tree. God warns Gentile believers against having an arrogant attitude towards the natural branches in Romans 11:18-24- “Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee. Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be graffed in. Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear: For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee. Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off. And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again. For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree?”
Let’s consider some common verses that are wrongly used to teach Replacement Theology:
- Galatians 6:16- “And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.” Is the church here referred to as the ‘Israel of God’? No, it is not. Instead, Paul is addressing two groups within the church: Gentile believers (referred to as “as many as walk according to this rule”) and Jewish believers (“the Israel of God”). The conjunction ‘and’ makes it clear that these are two distinct groups Paul is speaking about.
- Matthew 21:43- “Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.” This verse is used by some to teach that the church has replaced Israel and that God is done dealing with Israel. To interpret this verse in such a way, however, ignores the plain teaching of Scripture that: 1) God’s covenants with Israel cannot be broken (Jeremiah 33:19-22); 2) God still has a future for Israel after the ‘Church Age’ (Romans 11:25-26, 29). By comparing Scripture with Scripture, we know that whatever this verse is teaching, it is NOT teaching that the Church has replaced Israel. Just a few chapters later, Jesus said to the Jewish people- “For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.” (Matthew 23:39) The Israelites will not see their Messiah TILL they recognize Christ as their Messiah. That generation of Jews that rejected Jesus as Messiah at His first coming forfeited the kingdom, yet a future generation of Jews will receive Jesus as Messiah at His second coming and will inherit the promised Kingdom.
- Romans 9:6b- “For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:”. Paul here is distinguishing between national/ethnic Israel (which is in a state of unbelief) and a spiritual Israel (the believing remnant of Jews). Those who believe Replacement Theology would say that ‘spiritual Israel’ is the Church (made up of believing Jews and Gentiles). However, Paul is not speaking of Gentile believers or the church as a whole in this passage. Instead, Paul is making a distinction between national/ethnic Israel and the remnant of Jewish believers. This verse does not teach that the church is the new Israel or that the church has replaced Israel. Though national/ethnic Israel is in a spiritually dead condition, this verse does not negate the promises that national/ethnic Israel will be spiritually restored in the future.
- Galatians 3:28-29- “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” In this passage, Paul is emphasizing equality in salvation- not sameness in role and identity. This passage speaks of oneness in spiritual standing before God but does not erase natural distinctions such as ethnicity, social standing, or gender. This passage does not say that there are not ethnic Jews and ethnic Gentiles today- in the same way it does not say there are not biological males and biological females today. Instead, this verse is speaking about our equal standing before God in the matter of salvation. According to verse 29, it is true that all believers (Gentile and Jew) are Abraham’s seed in a spiritual sense and are ‘heirs according to the promise’. Believing Gentiles inherit God’s spiritual blessings through God’s promise to Abraham that in him all the families of the earth would be blessed. But this does not mean that Gentile believers are ethnic Israel or that the Church has replaced Israel.
Ultimately, Replacement Theology is a dangerous distortion of God’s Word that undermines the integrity of God’s promises, contradicts plain Scripture, fuels antisemitic beliefs, and denies any future hope of salvation for the Jewish people. As Bible-believers, we must stick with the Word of God and reject the error of Replacement Theology. God’s Word is clear: “Hath God cast away his people? God forbid” (Romans 11:1)
To be continued…
~Pastor Aaron Francis

Genesis 12:1-3- “Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee: And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.”







Sunday is not just another day of the week for the Christian. Instead, it is set apart as ‘the Lord’s Day’! It is a special day in which Christians gather to worship their risen Savior!